Contractual:
A contractual brief is a brief that, when signed, becomes a
legally binding contract between the employer and the employee. You now work
for them. This document dictates all the things the employee must do to fulfil
this contract, and going against it or failing to do things right or at all can
result in the contract being terminated and you not getting paid and losing a
job. It can also contain information about the individual, the client, the
product and payment.
Negotiated:
A negotiated brief is a brief that is discussed between the
client and the employer until they come to an agreement on how the finished
product should look. When both parties agree on how the product should look the
brief is signed and the client will go off and make it. These briefs can be
good because it means that both parties agree on how the product should look in
the ned so there is no disparity, but this can be seen as a negative if either
party disagree or want to do something a certain way.
Formal:
A formal brief is a written document that states detailed
information about the specifics of a job. More often than not it is a very
straightforward easy to follow document, if not a bit boring. The brief itself
may not always be classified as a legal document. One advantage is that these
briefs are easy to follow and straightforward, due to the lack of any
complexity. It does what it says on the tin, it’s a formal brief, it tells you
what to do.
Informal:
An informal brief is the exact opposite of a formal brief,
obviously, since it is more laid back and often doesn’t even include a written
document at all, with employers instead preferring to sit down with their
clients and have a laid back discussion over the product, maybe over coffee. It
is similar to a negotiated contract, only instead of the client and employer
sitting down to discuss the product, they are sitting down to discuss the terms
of the actual contract.
Commission:
A commission brief is normally where a large company or
corporation will employ and independent company to create a product for them.
These briefs are different to others because it is between large companies,
rather than a big company and a smaller client. A large disadvantage of these
briefs is that the product can be wholly owned by the larger commissioning
company, meaning they may not give the smaller client enough credit for the
work they did, making these briefs a bit of a risk.
When I initial received the brief for the Bede Drone Footage
shoot, we were sat in class when Mark, our tutor, told us all about a job offer
to film using the drone at Bede. Bede College were making a promotional video
for their college and sports centre and had noticed we had a drone in college.
The drone is a basic DJI Phantom 3 Standard They asked us to film with it to
get some cinematic shots for the video. Kaleb and I said we would do it and
asked for more information. Mark gave us the email address of Sophie Kruger,
who was the individual asking for the drone. I began emailing and asking for
information about the shoot and what would actually be needed. We agreed to
meet and discuss the job in person. I went upstairs to meet with Sophie in
person and we sat and discussed all the ins and outs of the job. It was a very
informal meeting, as was the actual brief. We talked about what kind of shots
would be needed, we discussed how best to make them look and how best to make
the drone footage fit into the promotional video. The discussions we had went
over various things such as target audience, budget and locations for filming, we
talked about dates and weather before deciding on a date and time for the whole
shoot. The brief allowed for a lot of freedom for us to almost anything we
wanted, bar a few exceptions. The client wanted a few specific shots, but other
than that we had nearly total freedom in terms of shots and direction. The
whole discussion we had definitely helped out in terms of communication skills
and meeting and talking with potential employers. I think it is also a very
good opportunity to learn and develop in terms of working for a client rather
than just for an assignment. It will also help to improve skills in the
industry as a whole. On this shoot I will be the director and Kaleb will be the
drone pilot/camera operator, so this will definitely help us both to develop
these skills, as these are both things that we have not had much chance to work
on.
One of our biggest concerns when making and planning this
shoot was health and safety. The drone is a very awkward piece of equipment
that has all kinds of requirements to think about before you can even get it
out, let alone film with it. Our main concern was weather, it can’t be too
windy or too wet, and otherwise the drone becomes inoperable. When it came to
this it was a simple case of checking and betting on the weather forecast for
the day, which luckily turned out to be right. There was no rain, barely a
cloud in the sky, and the wind was at a low enough level that flight would be
ok. The risk assessment had to be amended to include a separate segment about the
drone and how it works and all the hazards that come with that. Another health
and safety concern is people being in the way of the drone without realising.
One shot the client wanted was of the drone zooming into the main entrance of
the college, which we had to do backwards for filming purposes. Our concern
here was that the main entrance of the college has a thoroughfare that has
doors on either side, making it difficult to see outside from in. This was a
concern for us as the drone being that close to a building entrance is quite
unsafe. We worked this out by planning to have Sophie stand, voluntarily, in
the main entrance stopping people from leaving while we got the shot. However,
due to the presence of a tree in the way of the entrance, the shot was
impossible, so unfortunately we were unable to get this shot. Another major
concern for us was actually being allowed to film with the drone in and around
the college, as there are all kinds of laws in place to stop people flying
camera drones where they shouldn’t, and to stop people filming things or people
they aren’t allowed to. We got around this due to the fact that the college is
private property, and in order to film on private property all you need is
permission from whoever owns it. We asked Sophie if she would be able to speak
to the college principal and see if he could give us permission. After a brief
period she emailed me saying that he had given the all clear to film, so that
was one less problem to think about. In terms of organisational structure, we
set out to make it a very informal shoot, Sophie was watching over us making
sure everything went the way it was supposed to. This helped as it meant we
could discuss the shoot with her while we were there, making our lives much
easier.
When it came to deadlines, the deadline for us was simply
the end of term, since after this point Sophie was starting a new job, so she
wouldn’t be there to liaise with us about what needed to be done, so we had to
get everything filmed before then. This wasn’t a particularly hard task as the
actual shoot only took a couple of hours to complete. We decided on the date of
the 24th of April, a Tuesday when we were all free in the morning to
film. In terms of resources, the drone itself was not being used at all on the
day when we were filming so there was no time constraints in terms of needing
to be back at a certain time, which made our lives easier. In terms of
feedback, we had a constant rapport with Sophie before and after the filming,
making sure everything looked good and everything was paid for on time. After a
couple weeks Sophie emailed us saying that the footage had been edited and was
uploaded onto their Facebook page for all to see. She also told us that the
people who had seen the video and the people who were editing and commissioning
this all enjoyed and liked what we had shot, meaning everything worked out in
the end.
Kaleb and myself sat down and discussed how best to film
what was needed after I sat down with Sophie and we decided on a number of shots
that might look cinematic enough. We wanted a shot of the drone flying directly
or the college to help show off the scale of the building. We also wanted to
get shots going around the building to give it a sense of grandeur, and we made
certain to get shots that were from as far away as possible, to show off the
area around the college. When we filmed it we managed to get almost all of the
shots we wanted, barring the shot zooming into the main entrance, as previously
explained. One major problem was this very shot, we had been asked to film this
and tried to work out the logistics for it but unfortunately it just wasn’t
possible, it was too dangerous to have the drone fly towards the college and it
was too dangerous to fly away from it due to the tree blocking the path. In the
end we had to bench this shot and discussed his with Sophie, who was alright
with it since nothing could be done, apart from cutting the tree down, which we
weren’t allowed to do.
In terms of post-production, since we didn’t actually edit
the footage, we simply filmed it for them, the only way for us to keep track of
its progress once it was out of our hands was to email Sophie directly. She
said that the footage was great and looked amazing. We never had to go back and
redo anything or change anything.
Whilst liaising with the client, we met in person to begin
with for a discussion about the film and what needed filming, then it was all
done through emails. We met in person, obviously, when we went to Bede to film
the shoot, and here is when we were able to build a more informal, less
professional relationship with the client. We spoke about things other than the
shoot and tried to strengthen the relationship in case something came up, such
as reshoots or needing more shots, making our own lives easier in the process.
There were no real difficulties on before, during or after the shoot, minus the
shot we couldn’t do, so there was nothing serious to get in the way of the
shoot. There were also no complaints at any point during production, so that is
a nice plus.
The only real constraints we had to worry about would
probably be the weather impacting the use of our drone, but that turned out
alright so there was nothing to really worry about for the drone. We could only
film when everyone was in class so there were less people walking around
outside to disturb the shot, but we arrived and began filming at this time so
that worked out fine. The client did, however, request that we film in 1080i,
since this is what the rest of the promo video is being recorded in. In terms
of financial constraints, there weren’t many, aside from the travel to get
there. For Kaleb, he lived right near the college so he just walked in, I had
to get the bus, but I get a weekly pass so it was paid for with that. We do,
however, no longer own the footage since we were paid to film it and then
handed it off to them, so they are now the legal owners of the footage.
The management was done mainly through me speaking with
Sophie either in person or over emails. Through the liaising with Sophie, we
decided that the deadline would be the next half term, since this is when
Sophie starts her new job, so everything must have been done by then so as not
to miss out on the job. We got everything done in this time.
BEDE DRONE FOOTAGE –
SHOT LIST
Production Company
|
UFilms
|
Production Title
|
Drone footage for Bede
|
Director
|
Aaron Bootland
|
Camera
|
Kaleb Harvey
|
No.
|
Shot Type
|
Shot Description
|
1
|
Establishing
|
Slow tilt up from the ground to a front-on shot of the main college
building
|
2
|
Wide
|
Dolly forwards from high altitude, flying over the main building
while tilting down to keep it in frame
|
3
|
Wide
|
Fast orbit around the side of the main building
|
4
|
Wide
|
Fast orbit around the front of the main building
|
5
|
Wide
|
Dolly backwards away from Sports centre, with slow tilt up towards
horizon
|
6
|
Wide
|
Orbit around Sports centre
|
7
|
Wide
|
Dolly towards Sports centre
|
8
|
Wide
|
Lateral tracking shot across football pitch
|
9
|
Wide
|
Dolly towards football pitch, gradually increasing in altitude with
slow tilt down
|
10
|
Wide
|
Static pan across football pitch
|
11
|
Wide
|
Slow crane up looking at Sports centre, with slow tilt down
|
12
|
Wide
|
Fast dolly away from front door of main
building
|
Red text = Not achieved
Production Title: Drone
Footage for Promotional Video
| |||
Description of
Production:
|
College promotional
video
| ||
Production Date:
|
24/4/18
|
| |
Production Team: Aaron
Bootland, Kaleb Harvey
| |||
Location address’:
|
Bede Sixth Form
College
| ||
Please fill in table
accordingly – using table below
Hazards
|
Who is at risk?
|
Controls in place
|
Severity of Injury
|
Chance of injury
|
Risk
|
Action Priority
|
Traffic
|
Cast and crew
|
Ensure everyone is vigilant around roads
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
13
|
Loss of crew/cast member
|
Cast and crew
|
Cast and crew to follow production shooting schedules and daily call
sheets, paying attention to call times and meeting places.
Crew and cast to have each other’s contact details in case of any
delays or problems with meeting up on time, and use these wherever necessary.
All cast and crew involved in shooting on location MUST wait until
everyone has met at the designated time and place before going on location,
moving between locations, or leaving at the end of the shoot.
Crew and cast to stay together whilst on location, or in groups of 3
(MINIMUM) and inform the Director if they need to leave the group (eg, to get
food)
All production teams must carry college contact details – 01642 865400.
All production teams MUST behave sensibly and responsibly whilst on a
shoot.
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
Trailing wires/equipment on floor
|
Cast and crew
Members of public
|
All wires must be secured and marked with tape or an equivalent safety
measure wherever possible.
Cast and crew should be made aware of trailing wires and any equipment
at floor level during rehearsal.
Wherever possible, equipment should not be left on the floor, unless
completely necessary.
If possible, wires and other trip/fall hazards should be monitored
during scenes by a member of cast/crew who is not involved in filming.
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
Strangers
|
Cast and crew and public
|
The riverside area we will be filming at is a common area for the
public to walk through, making it a danger from strangers who intend to harm
others.
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
11
|
Tripping Hazards
|
Cast and crew and public
|
One of the actors in the film is set to run through the riverside area,
making tripping and falling a hazard.
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Flying drone
|
Crew and public
|
The drone has high-speed propeller blades which can cause injury to
people on contact. Since the college will be open during shooting and we will
be filming near the front doors, so extreme care and attention must be paid
to ensuring that the drone is kept away from students of the college as well
as any crew members.
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
11
|
Activities identified as requiring more specific assessments |
NOTES: Calculation of risk rating | ||
A: Severity of incident
Insignificant 1
Minor 2
Significant 3
Major 4
Fatality 5
|
B: Probability of occurrence
Very Unlikely 1
Unlikely 2
Possible 3
Likely 4
Very
Likely 5
|
Determining action priority
1 – 5 Risk acceptable – No
action
6 – 10 Low priority (Action if
reasonably practicable; otherwise, acceptable)
11 – 15 Medium priority
(Must take action)
16 – 25 High priority
(Must take action)
|
SIGNATURES
Prepared by: Signature ________________________Print name _____________________________________
Position on shoot: _________________________________________________________________ Date_________________________________________________
Assessment
checked by (Print) :
|
Signature:
|
Date
of Assessment:
|
Screenshots of the e-mails between myself and Sophie, discussing the dates and times of the shoot, as well as the hand over of the footage.
No comments:
Post a Comment